#SCAM2009

IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation

26 Sep, 18:35 @tiagomlalves: SCAM, ICSM and VISSOFT conferences went well: interesting presentations and people! Ended w/ a nice dinner panoramic restaurant 24th floor! ※ @

25 Sep, 15:28 @grammarware: #SCAM2009 & #ICSM2009 #FollowFriday 2 @ssepotsdam @tkobabo @taoxiease @tiagomlalves @tomzimmermann @yk2805 Full mapping: spoonfulofhacking.blogspot.com ※ @
15:28 @grammarware: #SCAM2009 & #ICSM2009 #FollowFriday 1: @abramh @avandeursen @dsebaceous @davema @frama_c @ICSMconf @j_ham3 @JurgenVinju @nicbet @quinndupont ※ @
8:15 @PaulKlint: #FollowFriday @jurgenvinju @grammarware @avandeursen thanks for #SCAM2009 and #ICSM2009 reporting. Saves a journey and high fees! ※ @

22 Sep, 19:58 @grammarware: #SCAM2009 → Edmonton sightseeing → Airport ✈ Calgary ✈ Frankfurt → Koblenz → Home → University (need to attend a talk there) ※ @
17:34 @grammarware: After #SCAM2009 I dropped by #ICSM to catch up with the SIG mafia—will even try to sneak in to the talk at 11:00. Flying home after that! ※ @
17:07 @breakfast_bot: RT @j_ham3 ICSM2009 breakfast was better than SCAM2009 breakfast. I had toast and cream cheese wi.. twitter.com , yum, i hope! ※ @
17:07 @j_ham3: ICSM2009 breakfast was better than SCAM2009 breakfast. I had toast and cream cheese with juice and coffee! ※ @
4:17 @edufelipedev: RT @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: “Multithreading is to concurrency what assembly language is to programming” © Robert Lange at #SCAM2009 ※ @
2:34 @grammarware: Getting a private presentation in grammar hacking by Ira Baxter. DMS can smart diff ASTs of parsed grammars. #SCAM2009 did not really end! ※ @
2:14 @dsebaceous: The Language Rascal sounded good at #scam2009. I downloaded it, but it's just for windoze :( ※ @
- 17:29 @jurgenvinju: @dsebaceous #SCAM2009 you must have found a different Rascal. It's for linux, mac and win. I would not advice to try it yet. Will update you ※ @
1:58 @j_ham3: SCAM2009 is over. ※ @
1:43 @grammarware: The voting at #SCAM2009 is over, SCAM 2010 will have Tom Dean and Sibylle Schupp in the organising committee. SCAM is over, thanks 4 reading ※ @
- 8:25 @JBezivin: @grammarware Thanks for reporting from #SCAM2009 ※ @
1:24 @grammarware: Did my best to keep #Rascal from stealing all the spotlight at the last discussion of #SCAM2009 ;) ※ @
0:40 @grammarware: The very last talk on #SCAM2009 is by @JurgenVinju and it’s about Rascal. This time he presents it as a DSL for code analysis & manipulation ※ @
0:24 @grammarware: El Hachemi Alikacem at #SCAM2009 talks about their metric extraction framework with a metric-oriented DSL called PatOIS. Only C++ for now. ※ @
0:16 @grammarware: One somewhat unexpected question/proposal by Ira Baxter during my talk at #SCAM2009: compute Levenshtein distance between converged grammars ※ @
- 4:13 @MarkusQ: @grammarware So is Levenshtein distance well defined for grammars? My intuition says no, but after thinking ~60s I can't nail it either way. ※ @
  - 14:51 @grammarware: @MarkusQ Ira Baxter shown me his tool that used Levenshtein for diffing and reported very detailed info like grammar transformation chain. ※ @
0:15 @abramh: #SCAM2009 @grammarware presented their grammar relatonship tool slps.sourceforge.net ※ @

21 Sep, 23:56 @j_ham3: SCAM2009 talk went well. ※ @
23:39 @grammarware: The next #SCAM2009 presentation after the small break is mine. Checking for the last technical problems. ※ @
23:31 @grammarware: At #SCAM2009 @JurgenVinju proposed to have a programming language design contest for languages that are easy to parse & analyse, not program ※ @
- 23:36 @JBezivin: @grammarware @JurgenVinju #SCAM2009 Languages for "human programmers" and languages for "computer generators" are (should be) different? ※ @
23:22 @grammarware: Discussion at #SCAM2009 led by Michael Godfrey: why and how to make code analysis tools and whether language extensions are syntactic sugar. ※ @
22:49 @grammarware: Valentin David at #SCAM2009 treats concepts in C++ as syntactic sugar. He translates (some) ConceptC++ code to C++03 code with templates. ※ @
22:46 @grammarware: Staying on the first (title) slide for several minutes is a bad idea,especially if the presentation you are giving is after lunch. #SCAM2009 ※ @
- 22:54 @GeePawHill: @grammarware dig it. believe it or not, it's a problem for me. if you see the doubledawg vids you see how i try to entertain in spite of. ※ @
22:43 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Michael Achenbach at #SCAM2009 talks abt abstraction engineering for program xform, manip, model checking & testing ※ @
22:42 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: James Hamilton (@j_ham3) says at #SCAM2009 all Java bytecode decompilers are bad. Small progress in this since 2003. ※ @
22:32 @grammarware: Michael Achenbach at #SCAM2009 gives a talk about abstraction engineering for program transformation, manipulation, model checking & testing ※ @
22:31 @frama_c: Java compilers do not do optimizations because JITs have all the information available for optimizing anyway -- Michael Ernst #scam2009 ※ @
22:29 @grammarware: James Hamilton (@j_ham3) tells us at #SCAM2009 that all Java bytecode decompilers are bad. Surprisingly small progress in this since 2003. ※ @
22:26 @frama_c: A good conference format is when you are tired at the end of the day from having been engaged continuously. #scam2009 ※ @
21:51 @j_ham3: Waiting to do my talk at SCAM2009 ※ @
21:42 @grammarware: Finally met @abramh in person during a coffee break. Eating chocolate cake to keep me alive and awake until my talk at #SCAM2009. ※ @
20:34 @grammarware: Sneaked out from #SCAM2009 for a little walk,bought some CDs—gotta disagree with @j_ham3, it’s a nice little city. People are quite friendly ※ @
19:50 @abramh: An OCAML C analysis suite RT Pascal Cuoq at #SCAM2009 presents Frama-C, the framework for verification of critical embedded source code. ※ @
19:25 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Pascal Cuoq at #SCAM2009: Frama-C framework for verification of critical embedded source code. Each anal is a plug-in there ※ @
19:25 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Tool demonstrations begin at #SCAM2009: the 1st one is by Tobias Gutzmann about backporting Java 5 code. ※ @
19:22 @grammarware: “Nobody except C compiler authors cares about their speed benchmarks” © Pascal Cuoq about abusing unclearly standardised language features. ※ @
19:18 @grammarware: Pascal Cuoq at #SCAM2009 presents Frama-C, the framework for verification of critical embedded source code. Each analysis is a plug-in there ※ @
19:14 @jurgenvinju: at #SCAM2009, "recoder meta programming system for Java" is used to translate java 5 source code back to 1.4 ※ @
19:10 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Dave Binkley talks (in place of Martin Ward) at #SCAM2009 about characterising slicing definitions by properties. ※ @
19:09 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Dennis Giffhorn talka at #SCAM2009 about extending source code slicing to concurrent programs by adding time-sensitivity. ※ @
19:08 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: “Multithreading is to concurrency what assembly language is to programming” © Robert Lange at #SCAM2009 ※ @
19:06 @grammarware: Tool demonstrations begin at #SCAM2009: the 1st one is by Tobias Gutzmann about backporting Java 5 code. The one by Martin Ward is cancelled ※ @
18:56 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: I always loved cross-paradigm maps. At #SCAM2009 we talk about functionality-preserving maps threading to message passing. ※ @
18:53 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: #SCAM2009 Best Paper “Recovering Rels from Java Lang Spec” by @notquiteabba & yours truly. uni-koblenz.de (congrats) ※ @
18:14 @jurgenvinju: at #SCAM2009 CSP is proposed as a programming model for multi-core programming (Robert Lange) ※ @
- 20:57 @MichalPise: @jurgenvinju Is CSP supposed to mean continuations-passing style or is it something different? ※ @
17:53 @frama_c: Another #scam2009 talk revisiting the fundamentals: definitions of slicing, issues with non-terminating programs. ※ @
17:50 @grammarware: Dave Binkley takes the place of Martin Ward to make a presentation at #SCAM2009 about characterising slicing definitions by properties. ※ @
17:43 @grammarware: Dennis Giffhorn gives a talk at #SCAM2009 about extending source code chopping & slicing to concurrent programs by adding time-sensitivity. ※ @
17:34 @grammarware: “Multithreading is to concurrency what assembly language is to programming” © Robert Lange at #SCAM2009 ※ @
17:25 @grammarware: I always loved cross-paradigm mapping. At #SCAM2009 we listen to a talk about functionality-preserving mapping threading to message passing. ※ @
17:20 @grammarware: And so the second day of #SCAM2009 begins, change of DJ from @jurgenvinju to @grammarware ;) ※ @
17:03 @abramh: There is so much chatter about functional programming at #SCAM2009 (well I get roped into it) ※ @
16:52 @grammarware: #SCAM2009 Best Paper Award goes to “Recovering Relations from Java Language Specification” by @notquiteabba & yours truly. uni-koblenz.de ※ @
- 16:54 @frama_c: @grammarware @notquiteabba Congratulations! ※ @
16:51 @frama_c: #scam2009 Interesting twitter.com by @psnively (reaction to previous tweet about "code smells") A source for the story, anyone? ※ @
16:13 @jurgenvinju: At #SCAM2009, presenting #RascalMetaLanguage (#Rascal) today in the last slot of the last session. Can hardly wait! ※ @
15:54 @j_ham3: SCAM2009 day 2. Today, I'm presenting my paper: An Evaluation of Current Java Decompilers. ※ @
12:19 @Felienne: Congratulations! @grammarware won the best paper award at #SCAM2009. (via @jurgenvinju) ※ @
21:16 @avandeursen: @grammarware Congrats with your best paper award at #scam2009!! ※ @
8:48 @tvdstorm: Congratulations! @grammarware won the best paper award at #SCAM2009. (via @jurgenvinju) (via @PaulKlint) ※ @
8:25 @PaulKlint: Thanks @jurgenvinju for the live coverage of #SCAM2009. ※ @
8:23 @PaulKlint: Congratulations! @grammarware won the best paper award at #SCAM2009. (via @jurgenvinju) ※ @
6:23 @jurgenvinju: @grammarware won the best paper award at #SCAM2009. Congratulations! ※ @
- 17:18 @grammarware: @jurgenvinju @paulklint @corpaul @tvdstorm @avandeursen @sig_eu @felienne thanks a lot! However, the paper is actually by @notquiteabba & me ※ @
4:29 @twapperkeeperRT: : @jobrieniii has created #SCAM2009 TwapperKeeper tweet archive-> twapperkeeper.com ※ @
2:12 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: #SCAM2009 code tracking discuss social network analysis comp'd to source code analysis (comp'g relationships, etc). ※ @
2:11 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Jaime Spacco at #SCAM2009 history of every LOC aids late fixing of bugs introduced earlier (&solve other problems). ※ @
2:10 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Dave Binkley at #SCAM2009: his search 4 causes of lge depend clusters. Turns out we can leave out “linchpin” vertices. ※ @
2:09 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Christian Prause at #SCAM2009: on code metadata maint. Fine-grained metadata like authorship-per-line is easily lost. ※ @
2:07 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Discussion led by @JurgenVinju at #SCAM2009: since simp static anal techs r good, shld we really try 2 improve them? ※ @
2:06 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Another “meta” talk at #SCAM2009 Tobias Gutzmann: how to improve an anal n what it means 2 improve it, w/ a case study. ※ @
2:04 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: On high level the diff btwn static and dynamic ests of test coverage is usually 5-8%, top 20% — @tiagomlalves at #SCAM2009 ※ @
2:03 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: At #SCAM2009 @tiagomlalves talks about using static analysis to calc test coverage (as opposed to contemp dynamic methods). ※ @
1:19 @jurgenvinju: Final note #SCAM2009; at #MSR many different information sources outside the code are used for analysis, and validation of analysis results ※ @
1:16 @jurgenvinju: at #SCAM2009, an analysis, like points-to, is reusable as a library if you have the space to store intermediate results (gigabytes) ※ @
1:13 @jurgenvinju: So @TiagoAlves can see if his static analysis can detect trends precisely even though the absolute prediction is a bit imprecise. #SCAM2009 ※ @
- 16:50 @grammarware: @jurgenvinju you’re making a common mistake, that was @tiagomlalves, not @tiagoalves at #SCAM2009 ※ @
1:11 @jurgenvinju: at #SCAM2009, Tiago Alves measures success of a static analysis not only by precision/recall, but also their derivation over version history ※ @
1:09 @jurgenvinju: at #SCAM2009, I thought it was dead, but "smart diffing" is still hot in the area of repository mining. ※ @
1:08 @jurgenvinju: at #SCAM2009: use AST's to canonicalize the text of a source code, then use simple scaleable text-based analysis (like diff). ※ @
1:06 @jurgenvinju: Dave Binkley at #SCAM2009 proposes the results on large dependence clusters {sh,c,w}ould be very influential. ※ @
0:44 @PaulKlint: Hi @grammarware: Thanks for your #SCAM2009 reporting. ※ @
0:36 @grammarware: At the #SCAM2009 code tracking discussion social network analysis gets compared to source code analysis (comparing relationships, etc). ※ @
0:34 @frama_c: Glimpse of a future talk slide at #scam2009. "Code smell" imagery is going to get worse before it gets better. Father holding diapered baby! ※ @
0:22 @bobnadler: #scam2009 Respectable conference (www2009.ieee-scam.org), horrible hash tag. ※ @
0:12 @frama_c: Attention, #scam2009 attendees: @nytimes article about pair programming. 216.209.19.114 via @bobnadler ※ @
0:02 @grammarware: Jaime Spacco at #SCAM2009 hunts for the history of every line of code to aid late fixing of bugs introduced earlier (&solve other problems). ※ @

20 Sep, 23:55 @grammarware: Dave Binkley talks at #SCAM2009 about his search for causes of large dependence clusters. Turns out we can leave out “linchpin” vertices. ※ @
23:36 @frama_c: The art of being able to talk interestingly without slides shouldn't be lost #scam2009 ※ @
23:32 @grammarware: Dave Binkley noticed my TweetDeck & asked me what game am I playing throughout the #SCAM2009 presentations. I brainwashed him about Twitter. ※ @
23:25 @grammarware: A talk by Christian Prause at #SCAM2009 on code metadata maintenance. Fine-grained metadata like authorship-per-line is rather easily lost. ※ @
23:22 @grammarware: The last session of today’s #SCAM2009 is starting, the time is nearing midnight. I’m trying to hold on, trying to pretend I’m in a party. ※ @
22:44 @avvin: RT @horno: вы что, не фолловите @zzzaraza - заблудшие ваши души! самый ожидаемый #sexymonday сезона ;) ※ @
- 21 Sep, 0:35 @grammarware: @avvin честное слово, попытался, но не смог. Это ж ужас слошной, что за твиты от неё идут :-/ ※ @
  - 0:37 @avvin: @grammarware От кого? :-/ ※ @
    - 0:40 @grammarware: @avvin ну а кого ты пиаришь вовсю? ;) От той, кому сто фолловеров для сексимандея надо. Кстати, мандей уже наступил, есичо, пару часов как… ※ @
      - 0:44 @avvin: @grammarware Не обращай внимания. ;))) Веселюсь. В другой раз лучше меня в ДМ спроси. ;)))) ※ @
      - 21:28 @sig_eu: @grammarware Thanks for the updates on #SCAM2009 and congratulations on the best paper award! ※ @
        17:28 @grammarware: @sig_eu you’re welcome; I’m glad I can keep the SIG mafia in touch with #SCAM2009 ;) ※ @
22:17 @grammarware: Discussion is now led by @JurgenVinju at #SCAM2009: since simple static analysis techniques are good, should we really try to improve them? ※ @
22:04 @grammarware: Another “meta” talk at #SCAM2009 by Tobias Gutzmann about how to improve an analysis and what does it mean to improve it, with a case study. ※ @
21:54 @MahalloMedia: # # @avandeursen glad you enjoy my #SCAM2009 coverage,too bad not many others are tweeting. And btw I use the longer hashtag, #scam is for.. ※ @
21:53 @MahalloMedia: # @avandeursen glad you enjoy my #SCAM2009 coverage,too bad not many others are tweeting. And btw I use the longer hashtag, #scam is for.. ※ @
21:53 @hashtager: # @avandeursen glad you enjoy my #SCAM2009 coverage,too bad not many others are tweeting. And btw I use the longer hashtag, #scam is for.. ※ @
21:49 @grammarware: On high level the difference between static and dynamic estimations of test coverage is usually 5-8%, top 20% — @tiagomlalves at #SCAM2009 ※ @
21:46 @grammarware: A lunch discussion about programming languages abundance, type checking, embedded languages, specifications, etc was really nice. #SCAM2009 ※ @
21:45 @frama_c: I do not condone animal cruelty, but I like this lolcat and I know how to use it i22.photobucket.com #scam2009 #icsm ※ @
21:44 @grammarware: At #SCAM2009 @tiagomlalves gives a talk about using static analysis to calculate test coverage (as opposed to contemporary dynamic methods). ※ @
20:55 @avandeursen: @grammarware Thanks for all the #scam tweets!! ※ @
- 21:50 @grammarware: @avandeursen glad you enjoy my #SCAM2009 coverage,too bad not many others are tweeting. And btw I use the longer hashtag, #scam is for scams ※ @
  - 22:07 @JBezivin: @grammarware Thx for your covering of #SCAM2009 , #scam ※ @
    - 22:11 @grammarware: @JBezivin glad you find it useful. #SCAM2009 ※ @
20:45 @tkobabo: Type 3 Cloneと Temporal Spec. の間をうまく定義できると面白いんだけど，みんな苦労しているのねー @ SCAM2009 ※ @
20:15 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Ira Baxter leads discuss: Will analysis of clone evolution lead clone detection into clone tracking and removal? #SCAM2009 ※ @
20:13 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Michael Godfrey: why is detection of type II clones harder than type I clones? Answer: too many false positives. #SCAM2009 ※ @
20:13 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Nils Göde talks at #SCAM2009 about evolution of type I clones. Evolution is linked to programming style. ※ @
20:12 @intel_chris: RT @grammarware: Rebecca Tiarks gave “meta” talk at #SCAM2009: analysed type III clone detectors by comp'g Levenshtein dist 2 human oracles. ※ @
19:53 @frama_c: Dear attendees of #scam2009 and #icsm: you may enjoy th.informatik.uni-mannheim.de (via @bmonate) ※ @
- 19:58 @bmonate: @frama_c at what time is your talk for #scam2009? Hope your slides are ready :-) ※ @
19:53 @grammarware: Will the analysis of clone evolution lead clone detection into clone tracking and clone removal? Ira Baxter leads discussion at #SCAM2009 ※ @
19:39 @grammarware: Michael Godfrey from the audience: why is detection of type II clones harder than type I clones? Answer: too many false positives. #SCAM2009 ※ @
19:24 @grammarware: Nils Göde talks at #SCAM2009 about evolution of type I clones. The results as I see them is: this evolution is linked to programming style. ※ @
19:21 @grammarware: Rebecca Tiarks gave a “meta” talk at #SCAM2009: they analysed type III clone detectors by comparing Levenshtein distance to human oracles. ※ @
18:48 @j_ham3: Just listened to an interseting keynote speach at SCAM2009 ※ @
18:36 @JBezivin: RT @grammarware M. Ernst : "There are two sources of programming bugs: improperly expressed design and improperly followed design" #SCAM2009 ※ @
18:12 @grammarware: The difference between a hacker and an engineer for Michael Ernst is that an engineer gets feedback during development. (Disagree) #SCAM2009 ※ @
18:06 @frama_c: #scam2009 keynote also contains the information that Java generics are "phantom types" (as they are called in #fp). They are interface-only. ※ @
17:58 @grammarware: Bookmarked to read later: a framework for type checkers portal.acm.org #SCAM2009 ※ @
- 18:08 @rsotnik: @grammarware #scam2009 keep it posting, my rostov pal :) makes us craftsmen smile :) ※ @
17:52 @grammarware: JDK libraries are not generic-correct (i.e., they are only signature-wise) because the renovation was not worth the risks & effort #SCAM2009 ※ @
17:31 @grammarware: “Typed programs do not go wrong” statement is true only if you define “go wrong” in a very specific way. © Michael Ernst #SCAM2009 ※ @
17:28 @grammarware: Michael Ernst thinks there are two sources of programming bugs: improperly expressed design and improperly followed design #SCAM2009 ※ @
- 18:03 @rsotnik: @grammarware "... improperly expressed design and improperly followed design..." :) what about illiteracy? :) ※ @
17:25 @grammarware: Michael Ernst’s presentation does not need questions to make a discussion, he is a discussion by himself: presents two opinions on any issue ※ @
17:16 @grammarware: Low-level technical problems try to get in the way: tables are collapsing, projectors are blinking, etc. #SCAM2009 ※ @
17:16 @frama_c: At #scam2009 (cohosted #icsm) I heard about en.wikipedia.org for the first time. It's linked to the US and the military. ※ @
- 17:19 @grammarware: @frama_c one is glad to be of service. Nice to meet you on twitter as well! #scam2009 ※ @
17:09 @grammarware: And so #SCAM2009 begins. Lots of familiar faces, the right community. Prepare yourselves for the upcoming twitflood. ※ @
16:13 @grammarware: Before @zef recovers from his wedding and posts a tweetview link, here goes mine for #SCAM2009 tweets archive: uni-koblenz.de ※ @
15:53 @j_ham3: SCAM2009 starts today. breakfast soon. ※ @
15:11 @jurgenvinju: Just finished my 10 slides for 10 minutes #SCAM2009 pitch. I've included a sound snippet. ※ @
14:42 @grammarware: Switched on TV, read “please review the map to closest exits”. Wonder how many accepts and rejects they will get from #SCAM2009 participants ※ @
4:07 @grammarware: Three movies, three papers & three airports later I’m finally in the awesome Fairmont Hotel for #SCAM2009. There were problems, all overcome ※ @
- 5:27 @jurgenvinju: @grammarware, hey I'm there too. Exhausted. See you tomorrow at #SCAM2009. ※ @
  - 5:37 @grammarware: @jurgenvinju I’ve just heard you pass by my door ;) Indeed, see you “tomorrow” (well, in Amsterdam/Koblenz it’s already 6am of tomorrow). ※ @

19 Sep, 21:26 @grammarware: Koblenz → Frankfurt ✈ Calgary ✈ Edmonton → #SCAM2009 ※ @
7:53 @frama_c: #scam participants, let's all use #icsm as hashtag instead! Have a good flight all. ※ @
3:47 @tiagomlalves: Arrived to edmonton, canada for SCAM and ICSM conferences! Trip and arrival to hotel went smoothly! ※ @

18 Sep, 19:59 @TenaciousGirl: The English country side is great.. fuck London.. ※ @
- 20:01 @j_ham3: @TenaciousGirl haha. I'm in Edmonton, Canada. It's so boring! ※ @
  - 20:43 @TenaciousGirl: @j_ham3 awww when will u be back in London. Canada... Hmmm. Never been ※ @
    - 20:59 @j_ham3: @TenaciousGirl I'm back next Friday. The conference starts Sunday. You don't wanna visit Edmonton lol ※ @
      - 21:01 @TenaciousGirl: @j_ham3 oh I'll be in London then. What conference are u going to? I went to Defcon during summer in Vegas developed cigar addiction ※ @
        21:05 @j_ham3: @TenaciousGirl SCAM2009. I'm presenting my paper. www2009.ieee-scam.org ※ @
18:09 @jurgenvinju: Flying to Edmonton to enjoy #SCAM2009 and #ICSM ※ @
21:30 @tiagomlalves: At schiphol airport on my way to Edmonton, Canada! ※ @

11 Sep, 12:24 @grammarware: Regarding the last tweet: it is about recovering relationships between grammars from language documentation! Looking forward to #SCAM2009. ※ @
12:23 @grammarware: I’m often misunderstood when I say my next presentation will be about recovering relationships. We should submit to psychology journals too. ※ @
- 12:25 @DoctorLHS: @grammarware Thats a great idea, you should contact Doctor LHS, we specialise in relationships....09057650102 5pm to 12am ※ @

Generated by Twit2Html on 6 November 2009.